Delaware County v. Board of Com'rs of Delaware County

1916 OK 276, 155 P. 881, 56 Okla. 81, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 667
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedFebruary 29, 1916
Docket6101
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 1916 OK 276 (Delaware County v. Board of Com'rs of Delaware County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Delaware County v. Board of Com'rs of Delaware County, 1916 OK 276, 155 P. 881, 56 Okla. 81, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 667 (Okla. 1916).

Opinion

Opinion by

WATTS. C.

On February 4, 1913, the board of county commissioners of Delaware county passed a resolution designating certain state banks as county depositories, and directed the county treasurer to deposit one-half of the county funds in said banks, deposits to draw "3 per cent, interest, and the remaining one-half of the funds to be let.for one year to the bank paying the highest rate of interest. The First National Bank of Grove bid 5% per cent, on daily balances, and was declared a county depository.

On February 5, 1913, the board of county commissioners passed a resolution directing the county treasurer to deposit one-half of the county funds in the bank last *82 mentioned. On October 8, 1918, the board of county commissioners passed the following resolution:

“Be it resolved by the board of county commissioners, of Delaware county, Okla.:
“That said board finds the following banks situated in Delaware county, Okla., are responsible and qualified to become depositories, viz.: First State Bank of Row, Row, Okla., First State Bank of Jay, Jay, Okla., Bank of ■Kansas, Kansas, Okla., First State Bank of Bernice, Bernice, Okla., Citizens’ Bank of Grove, Grove, Okla. And the board has taken from each of said banks a bond in the amount and condition as required by law, and each of said banks is hereby designated as a county depository, and the treasurer of the county is authorized, required, ordered, and directed to use each of said banks, and none other, as county depositories, and each of said banks is-required to comply with the conditions of its bond and to pay interest at the rate of 4 per cent, per annum on average daily balance, and shall credit the treasurer monthly with the interest as required by law.
“All other resolutions, orders, and commands with reference to said county deposits and depositories are hereby rescinded.
“E. B. Hunt, as county attorney, is hereby ordered and directed to immediately institute the proper proceedings to compel the treasurer to comply with this order and resolution.”

On petition of the requisite number of taxpayers the county attorney appealed to the district court from the resolution quoted. The board of county commissioners filed motion to dismiss the appeal, which was sustained on November 8, 1913, from which an appeal is prosecuted.

But, as the time over which the controversy arose has expired, and no practical relief can be gained by a de-> *83 cisión, the case becomes moot, and will be regarded as abstract and hypothetical, and not necessary for decision, and will be dismissed. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. State, 43 Okla. 368, 143 Pac. 37.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Poindexter v. Board of Ed. of Independent School Dist. No. 39
1935 OK 992 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)
Wallace v. McClendon
1930 OK 305 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1930)
Meese v. De Arman
1923 OK 1086 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Webb v. Oklahoma Gas & Elec. Co.
1923 OK 65 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Sanders v. City of Tulsa
1922 OK 320 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1916 OK 276, 155 P. 881, 56 Okla. 81, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delaware-county-v-board-of-comrs-of-delaware-county-okla-1916.