Wallace v. Ignacio

79 F. App'x 292

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: October 23, 2003
• Docket: No. 02-17509; D.C. No. CV-99-00351-DWH/RAM
• Status: Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

*

Nevada state prisoner Henry Vernon Wallace appeals the dismissal as untimely of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition challenging his conviction for murder in the second degree. The district court found that, because Wallace’s conviction became final before AEDPA’s effective date of April 24, 1996, he had until April 23, 1997 to file his federal habeas petition. The court thus held that Wallace’s petition was untimely filed on August 23, 1999. The court also found that Wallace was not entitled to either statutory or equitable tolling of the statute. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253, and we vacate the dismissal and remand for further development of the record.

The district court’s order predated our decisions in Lott v. Mueller, 304 F.3d 918 (9th Cir.2002) and Spitsyn v. Moore, No. 02-35543, 2003 WL 22271356 (9th Cir. August 5, 2003). Lott and Spitsyn hold that equitable tolling may be applicable under circumstances similar to the ones presented here. Thus, we vacate the judgment of the district court and remand with instructions to conduct an evidentiary hearing on whether tolling of the statute of limitations is appropriate in this ease. We need not, and do not, reach the merits of any other issue urged on appeal.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.