Wallace v. Georgia, Carolina & Northern Rwy. Co.

22 S.E. 579, 94 Ga. 732
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 18, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 22 S.E. 579 (Wallace v. Georgia, Carolina & Northern Rwy. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wallace v. Georgia, Carolina & Northern Rwy. Co., 22 S.E. 579, 94 Ga. 732 (Ga. 1894).

Opinion

The statute is found in Acts 1890-91, vol. 1, p. 188. The declaration was dismissed on demurrer. It alleges, that after the company, by contract made on July 9, 1892, had employed the plaintiff’ as its chief car-inspector, and while he was performing his duties as such on August 12, 1892, the company discharged him. On August 18th, he made a written request of the company to give him a specific statement in writing of the reasons which had caused his discharge, and, if the same had been induced in whole or in part by any complaint or communication made to the company, to inform him of the uature and substance of such communication or complaint, and when and by whom it was made. This written request was signed by him, and on the same day was served upon the company, being delivered to the local agent representing the company at its office and place of doing business in Eulton county, by the sheriff cf that county. Afterwards the plaintiff waited for more than twenty days, within which time the defendant should have delivered the written statement as requested to the plaintiff, or left it addressed to him with the county clerk; but the defendant failed and refused to give the information as requested in writing and as required by law, whereby it became liable to him in the .sum of $5,000, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Opinion No.
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1989
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1989
Weeren v. Evening News Assn.
152 N.W.2d 676 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1967)
Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Cheek
259 U.S. 530 (Supreme Court, 1922)
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Perry
259 U.S. 548 (Supreme Court, 1922)
Dickinson v. Perry
181 P. 504 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1919)
Opinion of the Justices to the Senate
220 Mass. 627 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1915)
Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. State
175 S.W. 1096 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1914)
St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Griffin
171 S.W. 703 (Texas Supreme Court, 1914)
St. Louis S. W. Ry. Co. of Texas v. Griffin
154 S.W. 583 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Ex parte Harrison
110 S.W. 709 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1908)
Pavesich v. New England Life Insurance
122 Ga. 190 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Murphey & Hunt
60 L.R.A. 817 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
State ex rel. Zillmer v. Kreutzberg
90 N.W. 1098 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1902)
New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Schaffer
65 Ohio St. (N.S.) 414 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 S.E. 579, 94 Ga. 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallace-v-georgia-carolina-northern-rwy-co-ga-1894.