Wall v. Office of Personnel Management

348 F. App'x 576
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided October 13, 2009·No. 2009-3205·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

LINN, Circuit Judge.

Wayne C. Wall (“Wall”) petitions for review of a final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”), dated April 17, 2009, which affirmed the denial of Wall’s application for disability retirement. Wall v. Office of Pers. Mgmt., 111 M.S.P.R. 122 (2009). In reaching that decision, the Board gave no weight to Wall’s post-termination medical evidence, citing Reilly v. Office of Personnel Management, 108 M.S.P.R. 360 (2008).

On July 15, 2009, we vacated the Reilly decision, holding that the categorical rejection of all medical evidence not based on tests or examinations conducted during the petitioner’s employment was an erroneous legal standard. Reilly v. Office of Pers. Mgmt., 571 F.3d 1372, 1382-83 (Fed.Cir.2009) (holding that the Board’s standard constitutes “a substantial departure from important procedural rights and goes to the heart of the administrative determination”). In the present case, because the Board’s categorical rejection of Wall’s post-termination medical evidence is improper under our recent decision in Reilly, we vacate the Board’s decision and remand for reconsideration under the correct legal standard.

VACATED and REMANDED

COSTS

No costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wall v. Office of Personnel Management, 348 F. App'x 576 (Fed. Cir. 2009).

348 F. App'x 576 (Wall v. Office of Personnel Management) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wall v. Office of Personnel Management
417 F. App'x 952 (Federal Circuit, 2011)