Walkes v. State

9 So. 3d 774, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6899, 2009 WL 1531802
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 3, 2009·No. No. 4D08-4305·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael Walkes filed a rule 3.850 motion seeking postconviction relief. The trial judge denied the motion without ordering a response from the state or attaching records to refute the claims. The court also did not state any reason for the denial in its order. As a result, we must reverse and remand for further review of the motion. See, e.g., Terry v. State,: 970 So.2d 863 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (citing Smith v. State, 956 So.2d 1266, 1267 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(d); Hayes v. State, 958 So.2d 571 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Dieudonne v. State, 958 So.2d 516 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).

Reversed and remanded.

GROSS, C.J., WARNER and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walkes v. State, 9 So. 3d 774, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6899, 2009 WL 1531802 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

9 So. 3d 774 (Walkes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holley v. State
67 So. 3d 443 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)