Walkes v. State

9 So. 3d 774, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6899, 2009 WL 1531802
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 3, 2009
DocketNo. 4D08-4305
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 9 So. 3d 774 (Walkes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walkes v. State, 9 So. 3d 774, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6899, 2009 WL 1531802 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael Walkes filed a rule 3.850 motion seeking postconviction relief. The trial judge denied the motion without ordering a response from the state or attaching records to refute the claims. The court also did not state any reason for the denial in its order. As a result, we must reverse and remand for further review of the motion. See, e.g., Terry v. State,: 970 So.2d 863 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (citing Smith v. State, 956 So.2d 1266, 1267 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(d); Hayes v. State, 958 So.2d 571 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Dieudonne v. State, 958 So.2d 516 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).

Reversed and remanded.

GROSS, C.J., WARNER and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holley v. State
67 So. 3d 443 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 So. 3d 774, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6899, 2009 WL 1531802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walkes-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.