Dieudonne v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dieudonne v. State

954 So. 2d 1254, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6094, 2007 WL 1201657

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 25, 2007

DocketNo. 4D07-900

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 954 So. 2d 1254 (Dieudonne v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dieudonne v. State, 954 So. 2d 1254, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6094, 2007 WL 1201657 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s Motion to Allow Correct Jail Credit. The trial court correctly credited petitioner with the 215 days he served in jail before sentencing. Our affirmance is without prejudice to petitioner seeking additional credit from the Department of Corrections for time he served in jail following sentencing and petitioning the circuit court in Leon County for a writ of mandamus if relief is not forthcoming after exhausting his administrative remedies. Grant v. State, 837 So.2d 1075 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); see also Bush v. State, 945 So.2d 1207, 1211 (Fla.2006) (holding that proper venue to challenge a DOC sentence-reducing credit determination is the circuit court in Leon County where DOC has its headquarters).

GUNTHER, WARNER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s Motion to Allow Correct Jail Credit. The trial court correctly credited petitioner with the 215 days he served in jail before sentencing. Our affirmance is without prejudice to petitioner seeking additional credit from the Department of Corrections for time he served in jail following sentencing and petitioning the circuit court in Leon County for a writ of mandamus if relief is not forthcoming after exhausting his administrative remedies. Grant v. State, 837 So.2d 1075 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); see also Bush v. State, 945 So.2d 1207, 1211 (Fla.2006) (holding that proper venue to challenge a DOC sentence-reducing credit determination is the circuit court in Leon County where DOC has its headquarters).

GUNTHER, WARNER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

954 So. 2d 1254, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6094, 2007 WL 1201657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dieudonne-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack