Pugh v. State
This text of 954 So. 2d 1254 (Pugh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Woodrow D. PUGH, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
*1255 Woodrow D. Pugh, Raiford, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Woodrow Pugh, appeals a trial court order summarily denying his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to rule 3.800(a), Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure, in which he challenged his sentence as being misapplied by the Department of Corrections. The Department of Corrections applied Pugh's sentences consecutively, while the trial court ordered them to be applied concurrently. We affirm the order under review, without prejudice to Pugh's ability to file a petition for writ of mandamus in the Leon County circuit court[1] after he fully exhausts his administrative remedies. The record is silent as to whether Pugh has yet exhausted his administrative remedies. King v. State, 665 So.2d 377 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
STEVENSON, C.J., STONE and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
NOTES
[1] See Bush v. State, 945 So.2d 1207, 1213-14 (Fla. 2006).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
954 So. 2d 1254, 2007 WL 1201695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pugh-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.