Walker v. Zorn
56 Ga. 35
This text of 56 Ga. 35 (Walker v. Zorn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Walker v. Zorn, 56 Ga. 35 (Ga. 1876).
Opinion
The count for mesne profits, in an action of ejectment, is a claim for money, and when such an action is pending we see no reason for denying the plaintiff the remedy of garnishment. The Code seems broad enough to embrace all money demands, whether resting on tort or on contract: Code, sections 3532, 3533, 3278.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Brydie v. Pritchard
100 S.E.2d 435 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1957)
Curtis v. Bailey
179 S.E. 633 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Gamble v. Central Railroad & Banking Co.
7 S.E. 315 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1888)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
56 Ga. 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-zorn-ga-1876.