Brydie v. Pritchard

Supreme Court of Georgia

Brydie v. Pritchard

100 S.E.2d 435, 213 Ga. 588, 1957 Ga. LEXIS 453

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedOctober 15, 1957

Docket19832

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 100 S.E.2d 435 (Brydie v. Pritchard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brydie v. Pritchard, 100 S.E.2d 435, 213 Ga. 588, 1957 Ga. LEXIS 453 (Ga. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

This action began in the fictitious form of ejectment, and contained a count for mesne profits. An answer having been filed, in which the defendant denied [589]*589possession, disclaimed any title or interest in the property described, and denied receiving any rents or profits from the use of the plaintiff's lands, and the petition haying been amended to add that the plaintiff had conveyed title to another, and “prays that this suit . . . proceed for the recovery of mesne profits only,” the action remains one for mesne profits only, and no longer involves title to land, since the petitioner has abandoned the action for ejectment. Hence, the Court of Appeals and not the Supreme Court has jurisdiction of the writ of error, under authority of Code (Ann.) §§ 2-3704, 2-3708. See Walker v. Zorn, 56 Ga. 35; Parker v. Salmons, 113 Ga. 1167 (39 S. E. 475); Moody v. McHan, 66 Ga. App. 29 (16 S. E. 2d 889).

Argued September 10, 1957 Decided October 15, 1957. O. J. Tolnas, Preston M. Almand, for plaintiff in error. Larry V. McLeod, Gardner & Gayner, contra.

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

This action began in the fictitious form of ejectment, and contained a count for mesne profits. An answer having been filed, in which the defendant denied [589]*589possession, disclaimed any title or interest in the property described, and denied receiving any rents or profits from the use of the plaintiff's lands, and the petition haying been amended to add that the plaintiff had conveyed title to another, and “prays that this suit . . . proceed for the recovery of mesne profits only,” the action remains one for mesne profits only, and no longer involves title to land, since the petitioner has abandoned the action for ejectment. Hence, the Court of Appeals and not the Supreme Court has jurisdiction of the writ of error, under authority of Code (Ann.) §§ 2-3704, 2-3708. See Walker v. Zorn, 56 Ga. 35; Parker v. Salmons, 113 Ga. 1167 (39 S. E. 475); Moody v. McHan, 66 Ga. App. 29 (16 S. E. 2d 889).

Argued September 10, 1957 Decided October 15, 1957. O. J. Tolnas, Preston M. Almand, for plaintiff in error. Larry V. McLeod, Gardner & Gayner, contra.

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 S.E.2d 435, 213 Ga. 588, 1957 Ga. LEXIS 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brydie-v-pritchard-ga-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack