Walker v. United States

636 F. Supp. 61, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31099
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma
DecidedJanuary 14, 1986
DocketCiv. No. 84-C-875-C
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 636 F. Supp. 61 (Walker v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. United States, 636 F. Supp. 61, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31099 (N.D. Okla. 1986).

Opinion

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

H. DALE COOK, Chief Judge.

This matter came on before the Court for non-jury trial on November 1, 1985, on the cause of action alleged by the Defendant, United States of America (“IRS”), in Count II of its Counterclaim against Additional Defendant, First National Bank and Trust Company of Miami, Oklahoma (“Bank”). The issues raised by Count II of the IRS Counterclaim had previously been severed by the order of this Court from the issues between the Plaintiff, R. Edward Walker (“Walker”) and the IRS.

The action by the IRS against the Bank alleges tortious conversion by the Bank of the proceeds of accounts receivable (“Receivables”) in the amount of $267,841.23 generated by the Pettett Corporation (“Pettett”) in its manufacturing business during a period beginning August 21, 1981, and ending September 8, 1981. The IRS claims a prior and superior interest in the Receivables by reason of federal tax liens filed on July 6, 1981, against Pettett for non-payment of withholding and FICA taxes due on wages paid to employees of Pettett during the Fourth quarter of 1980 and the first quarter of 1981. The total amount of taxes, penalty and interest claimed by the IRS under such liens was $289,905.12 as of September 30, 1985. The IRS conceded at the outset of trial claims against the Bank allegedly arising from a federal tax lien filed November 23, 1981. The Bank claims a prior and superior security interest in the Receivables which it collected as proceeds under a perfected security interest in all Pettett accounts receivable, inventory and the proceeds thereof owned by Pettett on August 20, 1981.

[62]*62The parties have submitted proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and the matter is now ready for disposition. After considering the pleadings, testimony, exhibits admitted at trial, all of the briefs and arguments presented by counsel for both parties, and being fully advised in the premises, the Court enters the following findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. 52(a).

Findings Of Fact

1. Defendant-Counterclaimant is the United States of America. Additional Defendant is a national banking association officing solely in Miami, Oklahoma.

2. The Court has jurisdiction of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1340 and 1346, and by 26 U.S.C. § 7402.

3. On the dates and for the periods listed below, the IRS made assessments against the Pettett Corporation for unpaid federal withholding taxes, penalties and interest, the unpaid balances of which as of September 30, 1985, are as follows:

Taxable Period Date of Unpaid Ending Assessment Balance
12/31/80 5/18/81 $51,370.44
3/31/81 5/18/81 238,534.68

4. On July 6, 1981, the IRS filed in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, Notices of Federal Tax Lien against Pettett pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code giving notice of liens for the assessments listed in Paragraph 3.

5. With respect to the Notices of Tax Lien for the fourth quarter of 1980 and the first quarter of 1981 described in Paragraph 4 above, August 21, 1981, was the 46th day after the filing date contemplated by Section 6323(c) of the Internal Revenue Code.

6. During the period beginning August 21, 1981, and ending September 8, 1981, Pettett Corporation shipped and billed for goods sold in the ordinary course of business thereby bringing into existence account receivables (“Receivables”) totaling $267,841.23.

7. On August 20, 1981, Pettett owned and had on hand at its plant in Miami, Oklahoma, inventory consisting of $130,-000.00 in finished goods and $650,000.00 in raw materials. The raw materials on hand were sufficient to provide all materials required to operate the Pettett plant for a period of from three to eight weeks. A minimum of three weeks supply of all materials required in the manufacturing process was on hand and an eight week supply existed as to some raw materials.

8. During the period from August 21, 1981, to and including September 8, 1981, Pettett shipped $120,587.94 worth of the finished goods on hand on August 20,1981, and during the same period used $99,550.55 in raw materials on hand on August 20, 1981, to manufacture and ship the balance of the goods sold which generated the Receivables in the amount of $267,841.23.

9. On February 8, 1979, Pettett entered into a loan agreement with the Bank under which it borrowed $750,000.00. Such loan remained outstanding at all times relevant to this action and was later increased. On August 20, 1981, the outstanding principal balance of the loan was $989,400.00.

10. The loan from the Bank to Pettett described in Paragraph 9 above was secured by a properly executed and delivered financing statement and security agreement, describing as collateral all of Pettett’s then owned and thereafter acquired inventory, accounts receivable and the proceeds therefrom.

11. The financing statement described in Paragraph 10 above was filed with the County Clerk of Oklahoma County on February 14, and February 23, 1979.

12. The Receivables in the amount of $267,841.23 generated by Pettett during the period from August 21, 1981, to September 8, 1981, were assigned to the Bank during such period and were later collected in due course and applied against Pettett’s loan at the Bank under a procedure which directed all payments on Receivables to a special post office box controlled by the Bank. All payments were picked up from [63]*63the post office by the Bank and deposited to a special account at the Bank in the name of Pettett from which debits were made to pay Pettett’s loan. At all times, the payments were segregated from other Pettett funds and identifiable as the proceeds of the Receivables.

Conclusions Of Law

1. The Court has jurisdiction of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1340 and § 1346, and pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7402.

2. The outstanding loan of the Bank to Pettett in the amount of $989,400.00 on August 20, 1981, was secured by a continuously perfected security interest under the Oklahoma Uniform Commercial Code in all inventory and accounts receivable owned by Pettett on that date and the proceeds therefrom.

3. The perfected security interest of the Bank was a commercial transaction financing agreement covering qualified property in the form of inventory in the amount of $780,000.00 owned by Pettett on August 20, 1981, within the meaning of Section 6323(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

4. Of the Receivables in the amount of $267,841.23 generated by Pettett from August 21, 1981, to September 8, 1981, $220,-138.49 were the identifiable proceeds from the disposition of inventory owned by Pettett on August 20, 1981, within the meaning of Section 6323(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re NuMed Home Health Care, Inc.
323 B.R. 528 (M.D. Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
636 F. Supp. 61, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-united-states-oknd-1986.