Walker v. Stryker Corporation

District Court, S.D. California·Decided June 9, 2022·No. 3:22-cv-00264·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KYLE WALKER, Case No.: 22-cv-00264-MMA-JLB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER: 13 v. (1) GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO 14 STRYKER EMPLOYMENT AMEND THE SCHEDULING COMPANY, LLC, et al., 15 ORDER; Defendants. 16 (2) ISSUING AMENDED 17 SCHEDULING ORDER; AND

18 (3) CONVERTING MANDATORY 19 SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE TO VIDEO 20

21 [ECF Nos. 15; 29] 22 23 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order. 24 (ECF No. 29.) Good cause appearing, the parties’ joint motion (ECF No. 29) is 25 GRANTED, and the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 15) is amended as follows: 26 1. All fact and expert discovery must be completed by all parties by 27 September 26, 2022. “Completed” means that all discovery under Rules 30-36 of the 28 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and discovery subpoenas under Rule 45, must be 1 initiated a sufficient period of time in advance of the cut-off date, so that it may be 2 completed by the cut-off date, taking into account the times for service, notice and 3 response as set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Counsel must promptly 4 and in good faith meet and confer with regard to all discovery disputes in 5 compliance with Local Rule 26.1(a). The Court expects counsel to make every effort to 6 resolve all disputes without court intervention through the meet and confer process. 7 Discovery disputes must be brought to the Court’s attention in the time and manner 8 required by § V of Judge Burkhardt’s Civil Chambers Rules. All discovery disputes 9 must be raised within 30 calendar days of the service of an objection, answer, or 10 response that becomes the subject of dispute, or the passage of a discovery due date 11 without response or production, and only after counsel (and any unrepresented parties) 12 have met and conferred to resolve the dispute. See J. Burkhardt Civ. Chambers R. § V. 13 A failure to comply in this regard will result in a waiver of a party’s discovery issue. 14 Absent an order of the court, no stipulation continuing or altering this requirement 15 will be recognized by the court. 16 2. The parties must designate their respective experts in writing by July 29, 17 2022. The parties must identify any person who may be used at trial to present evidence 18 pursuant to Rules 702, 703 or 705 of the Fed. R. Evid. This requirement is not limited to 19 retained experts. The date for exchange of rebuttal experts must be by August 26, 2022. 20 The written designations must include the name, address and telephone number of the 21 expert and a reasonable summary of the testimony the expert is expected to provide. The 22 list must also include the normal rates the expert charges for deposition and trial 23 testimony. 24 3. By July 29, 2022, each party must comply with the disclosure provisions in 25 Rule 26(a)(2)(B) and (C) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This disclosure 26 requirement applies to all persons retained or specially employed to provide expert 27 testimony, or whose duties as an employee of the party regularly involve the giving of 28 expert testimony. Except as provided in the paragraph below, any party that fails to 1 make these disclosures will not, absent substantial justification, be permitted to use 2 evidence or testimony not disclosed at any hearing or at the time of trial. In 3 addition, the Court may impose sanctions as permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c). 4 4. Any party must supplement its disclosure regarding contradictory or rebuttal 5 evidence under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(D) by August 26, 2022. 6 5. Failure to comply with this section or any other discovery order of the court 7 may result in the sanctions provided for in Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, including a prohibition on 8 the introduction of experts or other designated matters in evidence. 9 6. All dispositive pretrial motions, including motions for summary judgment 10 and motions addressing Daubert issues, must be filed by October 31, 2022.1 Counsel for 11 the moving party must obtain a motion hearing date from Judge Anello’s law clerk. The 12 period of time between the date you request a motion date and the hearing date may vary 13 from one district judge to another. Please plan accordingly. Failure to make a timely 14 request for a motion date may result in the motion not being heard. 15 7. If appropriate, following the filing of an order ruling on a motion for 16 summary judgment or other dispositive pretrial motion, or in the event no such motion is 17 filed, after the expiration of the deadline set forth in paragraph 8, supra, Judge Anello will 18 issue a pretrial scheduling order setting a pretrial conference, trial date, and all related 19 pretrial deadlines. The parties must review and be familiar with Judge Anello’s Civil 20 Chambers Rules, which provide additional information regarding pretrial scheduling. 21 8. The Mandatory Settlement Conference (“MSC”) scheduled for November 22 16, 2022 at 9:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt is hereby converted to 23 video conference.2 Mandatory directions for participating in the MSC by video 24

25 1 This deadline is not applicable to pretrial motions in limine. For further 26 information regarding motions in limine, please refer to Judge Anello’s Civil Chambers 27 Rules. 2 If any party believes the MSC is more likely to be successful if conducted in- 28 1 conference are attached hereto. The purpose of the MSC is to permit an informal, 2 candid discussion between the attorneys, parties, and the settlement judge of every aspect 3 of the lawsuit in an effort to achieve a mediated resolution of the case. All MSC 4 discussions will be off the record, privileged, and confidential. See CivLR 16.3(h). 5 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16.3, all party representatives and claims adjusters for 6 insured defendants with full and unlimited authority3 to negotiate and enter into a binding 7 settlement, as well as the principal attorney(s) responsible for the litigation, must be 8 present and legally and factually prepared to discuss and resolve the case at the MSC. In 9 the case of an entity, an authorized representative of the entity who is not retained outside 10 counsel must be present and must have discretionary authority to commit the entity to pay 11 an amount up to the amount of the Plaintiff’s prayer (excluding punitive damages 12 prayers). The purpose of this requirement is to have representatives present who can 13 settle the case during the course of the conference without consulting a superior. 14 Failure to attend the MSC or obtain proper excuse will be considered grounds 15 for sanctions. 16 No later than 21 days before the MSC, the parties shall exchange formal 17 settlement proposals, as required by § III.A. of Judge Burkhardt’s Civil Chambers Rules. 18 19 and conferring, and no later than 60 days before the MSC, the parties shall leave a joint voicemail with chambers at (619) 557-6624 indicating which of the parties requests an 20 in-person MSC. In the voicemail, the parties shall leave three mutually available dates 21 for a telephonic status conference to discuss whether the MSC should be held in-person. The final decision will be made by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. Stryker Corporation, (S.D. Cal. 2022).

Walker v. Stryker Corporation (Walker v. Stryker Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related