Walker v. State

91 S.W.2d 731, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 801
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 26, 1936
DocketNo. 17995
StatusPublished

This text of 91 S.W.2d 731 (Walker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. State, 91 S.W.2d 731, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 801 (Tex. 1936).

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of unlawfully breaking, injuring, and tampering with the door handle of an automobile without the consent of the owner thereof, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the county jail for-a term of 270 days.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The [732]*732indictment charges the offense in the language of the statute, which is deemed sufficient.

No error having been perceived or pointed out, the judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

■ The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 S.W.2d 731, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.