Walker v. State

88 S.W.2d 495, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 600
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Walker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 Tex. Crim. 112
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 11, 1935·No. No. 17796·Published

Opinion

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is possessing equipment for manufacturing whisky; the punishment!, confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

Pending appeal, the law (Pen.Code 1925, art. 666 et seq., as amended) under which conviction was had has been repealed (Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666—49). See Guy Meadows v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 88 S.W.(2d), 481, delivered November 27, 1935.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. State, 88 S.W.2d 495, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 600 (Tex. 1935).

88 S.W.2d 495 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.