Walker v. State

1937 OK CR 14, 64 P.2d 935, 60 Okla. Crim. 302, 1937 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 10
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedJanuary 27, 1937
DocketNo. A-9092.
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 1937 OK CR 14 (Walker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. State, 1937 OK CR 14, 64 P.2d 935, 60 Okla. Crim. 302, 1937 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 10 (Okla. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

BAREFOOT, J.

The plaintiff in error, Benton Walker, was convicted of burglary in the second degree in Jackson county, Okla., on the 28th day of September, 3935, and was sentenced to serve a term of two years in the state penitentiary. His appeal was filed in this court on March 27, 1936.

No brief has been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error and no appearance was made when the case was set for oral argument.

The rule has long been established in this court that when no brief is filed, or no appearance made for oral argument, the record will be examined for the purpose of determining whether or not jurisdictional facts are disclosed, and when such facts are disclosed, and no fundamental error appears, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed. Bloodsworth v. State, 10 Okla. Cr. 99, 133 Pac. 1131; Spann v. State, 22 Okla. Cr. 128, 210 Pac. 315; Gladys Mitchell v. State, 35 Okla. Cr. 61, 248 Pac. 654; Bob Jones et al. v. State, 58 Okla. Cr. 308, 53 Pac. (2d) 292.

We have carefully examined the record in this case and we find no error justifying a reversal. The defendant was given a fair trial. The jury, after hearing the testimony, found the defendant guilty. The judgment of the district court of Jackson county is therefore affirmed. John Bradley v. State, 18 Okla. Cr. 503, 196 Pac. 730; Holloway v. State, 37 Okla. Cr. 24, 255 Pac. 1022; Can *304 non v. State, 51 Okla. Cr. 304, 1 Pac. (2d) 791; Jim Hart v. State, 57 Okla. Cr. 372, 48 Pac. (2d) 337.

DAVENPORT, P. J., and DOYLE, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dunnam v. State
1955 OK CR 49 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1955)
Owens v. State
1950 OK CR 147 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1950)
Hood v. State
1950 OK CR 142 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1950)
Wickers v. State
1949 OK CR 84 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1949)
Whitlow v. State
1947 OK CR 91 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1947)
State v. Sisler
1941 OK CR 21 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1941)
Smith v. State
1940 OK CR 90 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1940)
Henley v. State
1939 OK CR 59 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1939)
Hickman v. State
1937 OK CR 26 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1937 OK CR 14, 64 P.2d 935, 60 Okla. Crim. 302, 1937 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-state-oklacrimapp-1937.