Walker v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Walker v. State

1939 OK CR 31, 295 P. 239, 49 Okla. Crim. 427, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 24

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 17, 1931

DocketNo. A-7687.

StatusPublished

This text of 1939 OK CR 31 (Walker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walker v. State, 1939 OK CR 31, 295 P. 239, 49 Okla. Crim. 427, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 24 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVENPORT, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was convicted in the district court of Kay county, on a charge of selling whisky to a minor, and was sentenced to serve a term of 60 days in jail and pay a fine of $100. From which judgment and sentence the defendant has appealed.

The transcript of the record was filed in this court on December 12, 1929. No brief has been filed on behalf of the defendant, and no appearance made for oral argument. Where no brief is filed and no appearance is made for the defendant, this court will consider the appeal is without merit or has been abandoned.

*428 After a careful examination of tbe record, the court finds the information sufficient to charge an offense; the instructions fairly stated the law, and that the defendant was accorded a fair trial. The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

EDWARDS and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVENPORT, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was convicted in the district court of Kay county, on a charge of selling whisky to a minor, and was sentenced to serve a term of 60 days in jail and pay a fine of $100. From which judgment and sentence the defendant has appealed.

The transcript of the record was filed in this court on December 12, 1929. No brief has been filed on behalf of the defendant, and no appearance made for oral argument. Where no brief is filed and no appearance is made for the defendant, this court will consider the appeal is without merit or has been abandoned.

*428 After a careful examination of tbe record, the court finds the information sufficient to charge an offense; the instructions fairly stated the law, and that the defendant was accorded a fair trial. The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

EDWARDS and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1939 OK CR 31, 295 P. 239, 49 Okla. Crim. 427, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-state-oklacrimapp-1931.