Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Walker v. State

Walker v. State

913 So. 2d 706, 2005 WL 2656259
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 19, 2005·No. 3D04-667·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

913 So.2d 706 (2005)

Keair WALKER, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D04-667.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

October 19, 2005.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Kalter, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Michael E. Hantman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before RAMIREZ, WELLS, and CORTIÑAS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Keair Walker appeals his judgment of conviction and sentence. We affirm because, even if the trial court erred in disallowing witness testimony about prior drug use, Walker failed to preserve the issue for *707 appellate review. See Lucas v. State, 568 So.2d 18, 21-22 (Fla.1990).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. State, 913 So. 2d 706, 2005 WL 2656259 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

913 So. 2d 706 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. State
990 So. 2d 1119 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)