Walker v. State

692 So. 2d 318, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4859, 1997 WL 216598
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 2, 1997·No. No. 96-2173·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court but strike conditions 18 and 19 of the order of probation requiring payment of investigative costs. See Pazo v. State, 684 So.2d 898 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).

COBB, W. SHARP and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. State, 692 So. 2d 318, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4859, 1997 WL 216598 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

692 So. 2d 318 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bisson v. State
696 So. 2d 504 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Kirkman v. State
692 So. 2d 318 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)