Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Walker v. State

Walker v. State

643 So. 2d 27, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8837, 1994 WL 486588
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Walker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5370 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 9, 1994·No. No. 94-2064·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to Appellant refiling his petition as to that part of his claim of ineffective counsel relating to his counsel’s failure to investigate whether a third party, Tom Morgan, had confessed to committing the offense, if accompanied by a sworn statement by Appellant demonstrating a factual basis for Appellant’s allegations.

DELL, C.J., and STONE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. State, 643 So. 2d 27, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8837, 1994 WL 486588 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

643 So. 2d 27 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.