Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Walker v. State

Walker v. State

504 So. 2d 58, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 844, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7351
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Walker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 Fla. L. Weekly 390 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 24, 1987·No. No. 85-2615·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant’s conviction is affirmed. State v. Murray, 443 So.2d 955 (Fla.1984); Blair v. State, 406 So.2d 1103 (Fla.1981); Zamot v. State, 375 So.2d 881 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Oliva v. State, 346 So.2d 1066 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). The defendant’s sentence is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court for the entry of a written statement pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(ll) delineating the trial court’s reasons for deviating from the guidelines. See Echevarria v. State, 492 So.2d 1146 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (unsigned notations on a sentencing guidelines score-sheet do not serve as a written order); Bauza v. State, 491 So.2d 323 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (same).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. State, 504 So. 2d 58, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 844, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7351 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

504 So. 2d 58 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blair v. State
406 So. 2d 1103 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Echevarria v. State
492 So. 2d 1146 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Zamot v. State
375 So. 2d 881 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Bauza v. State
491 So. 2d 323 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Oliva v. State
346 So. 2d 1066 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
State v. Murray
443 So. 2d 955 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)