Walker v. State

484 So. 2d 58, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 499, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6471
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Walker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 458 So. 2d 396
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 21, 1986·No. No. 85-2728·Published

Opinion

[59]*59ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

In his motion for post-conviction relief, Walker alleges that the trial court retained jurisdiction over one-third of a life sentence. If true, the retention should be stricken. Willis v. State, 447 So.2d 283 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). We remand this case to the trial court with directions either to grant the relief requested or to attach sufficient portions of the record to demonstrate that Walker is not entitled to relief. The order denying Walker’s motion for post-conviction relief otherwise is affirmed.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. State, 484 So. 2d 58, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 499, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6471 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

484 So. 2d 58 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Willis v. State
447 So. 2d 283 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)