Walker v. Smith

121 S.E. 692, 31 Ga. App. 205, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 850
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 23, 1923·No. 14622·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Jenkins, P. J.

This case is controlled by the ruling made in Springer v. Owen, 145 Ga. 730 (89 S. E. 780), and there being no assignment of error in the record which can be determined without reference to the unapproved and unidentified evidence accompanying copies of the pleadings, the judgment must be affirmed. See also Rushing v. DeLoach, 149 Ga. 483 (3) (100 S. E. 571).

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. Smith, 121 S.E. 692, 31 Ga. App. 205, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 850 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

121 S.E. 692 (Walker v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boston Insurance Co. v. Harmon
18 S.E.2d 84 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Woodall v. McCurry
177 S.E. 919 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
McKenzie Trust Co. v. Bullard
132 S.E. 125 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)