Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Jones v. Wadley

Jones v. Wadley

89 S.E. 681, 145 Ga. 569, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 404
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 15, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 89 S.E. 681 (Jones v. Wadley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Wadley, 89 S.E. 681, 145 Ga. 569, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 404 (Ga. 1916).

Opinion

Evans, P. J.

The judgment excepted to is one of nonsuit. The bill of exceptions contains the oral testimony, and refers to the documentary evidence introduced on the trial as attached to the bill of exceptions, marked with certain letters of the alphabet. After the certificate of the trial judge appear what purport to be copies of certain documents, but they are not identified by any signature of the judge. Held, that the documentary evidence is not lawfully before the court; and as a consideration of the same is necessary to adjudicate the correctness of the judgment of nonsuit, the judgment must be affirmed. Roberts v. Cairo, 133 Ga. 642 (66 S. E. 938).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grimes v. Slaughter
121 S.E.2d 110 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1961)
Flowers v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
67 S.E.2d 159 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Walker v. Smith
121 S.E. 692 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Caldwell v. Sturdivant
118 S.E. 39 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1923)
Rushing v. DeLoach
100 S.E. 571 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 S.E. 681, 145 Ga. 569, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-wadley-ga-1916.