Walker v. Goetz

Court of Appeals of Texas

Walker v. Goetz

218 S.W. 571, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 80

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 22, 1920

DocketNo. 1043.

StatusPublished

This text of 218 S.W. 571 (Walker v. Goetz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walker v. Goetz, 218 S.W. 571, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 80 (Tex. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

WALTHALL, J.

This is a companion case to the case of Mrs. John Walker v. C. E. Goetz, 218 S. W. 569, this day decided by this court. The pleadings of both parties, the evidence, and the proceedings had herein are practically the same as in the former case, except that in this case the husband did not join the wife in the execution of the promissory note, and, as required by articles 1840 and 1841, Vernon’s Sayles’ Civil Statutes, as to the husband, while joined in the suit with the wife, no judgment whs rendered against him.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WALTHALL, J.

This is a companion case to the case of Mrs. John Walker v. C. E. Goetz, 218 S. W. 569, this day decided by this court. The pleadings of both parties, the evidence, and the proceedings had herein are practically the same as in the former case, except that in this case the husband did not join the wife in the execution of the promissory note, and, as required by articles 1840 and 1841, Vernon’s Sayles’ Civil Statutes, as to the husband, while joined in the suit with the wife, no judgment whs rendered against him.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

218 S.W. 571, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-goetz-texapp-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack