Walker v. Dorminey

104 S.E. 447, 150 Ga. 635, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 263
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 13, 1920
DocketNo. 2051
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 104 S.E. 447 (Walker v. Dorminey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. Dorminey, 104 S.E. 447, 150 Ga. 635, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 263 (Ga. 1920).

Opinion

Hill, J.

Walker, was indicted for simple larceny, being charged with the offense of hog-stealing. On the trial of the case the jury found the defendant guilty, and recommended that he be punished as for a misdemeanor. The trial judge approved the recommendation of the jury and sentenced the accused as for a misdemeanor, the sentence being for eight months on the chain-gang, with the provision . that after serving four months of the sentence the defendant could [636]*636bo discharged upon the payment of a fine of one hundred and twenty-live dollars. The defendant was thereupon remanded into the custody of the sheriff, to begin serving his sentence. While in the custody of the sheriff he filed a petition for habeas corpus, based upon the contention that the verdict in the case did not comply with the requirement of the act of 1919 (Acts 1919, p. 387), in that it failed to prescribe the minimum and maximum term of punishment applicable to felony cases, and therefore that the verdict was illegal and void and could not be made valid by the decision of the judge approving the recommendation of the jury and sentencing the defendant as for a misdemeanor. Meld:

No. 2051. October 13, 1920. Habeas corpus. Before Judge Gower. Ben Hill superior court. April 23, 1920. Cutis c& Nicholson, for plaintiff.

1. The act of 1919 (Acts 1919, p. 387), providing for indeterminate sentences, applies to cases of conviction of felonies not punishable by life imprisonment, and where the court sentences the convicted person to the penitentiary in accordance with the, verdict of the jury.

2. The court did not err in denying the writ of habeas corpus as prayed for. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rhodes v. State
138 S.E. 286 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Durden v. State
110 S.E. 283 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 S.E. 447, 150 Ga. 635, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-dorminey-ga-1920.