Rhodes v. State
138 S.E. 286, 36 Ga. App. 769, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 302
Opinion
1. There is nothing that requires the grant of a new trial in the ground of the motion for a new trial which alleges that the court erred in the charge on confessions.
2. Under the ruling in Lee v. State, 35 Ga. App. 235 (133 S. E. 281), there is no merit in any of the other special grounds of the motion. See also Walker v. Dorminey, 150 Ga. 635 (104 S. E. 447).
3. There is ample evidence to sustain the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rhodes v. State, 138 S.E. 286, 36 Ga. App. 769, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 302 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).
138 S.E. 286 (Rhodes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Walker v. Dorminey
104 S.E. 447 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1920)
Lee v. State
133 S.E. 281 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)