Rhodes v. State
138 S.E. 286, 36 Ga. App. 769, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 302
This text of 138 S.E. 286 (Rhodes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rhodes v. State, 138 S.E. 286, 36 Ga. App. 769, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 302 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).
Opinion
1. There is nothing that requires the grant of a new trial in the ground of the motion for a new trial which alleges that the court erred in the charge on confessions.
2. Under the ruling in Lee v. State, 35 Ga. App. 235 (133 S. E. 281), there is no merit in any of the other special grounds of the motion. See also Walker v. Dorminey, 150 Ga. 635 (104 S. E. 447).
3. There is ample evidence to sustain the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Walker v. Dorminey
104 S.E. 447 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1920)
Lee v. State
133 S.E. 281 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
138 S.E. 286, 36 Ga. App. 769, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhodes-v-state-gactapp-1927.