Walden v. State
682 So. 2d 1196, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11960, 1996 WL 656170
Opinion
Appellant raises two issues on appeal, only one of which has merit. Appellant’s conviction on count two, armed robbery, is reversed. Brown v. State, 430 So.2d 446, 447 (Fla.1983) (‘What is dispositive is whether there have been successive and distinct forceful takings with a separate and independent intent for each transaction.”) Accord Taylor v. State, 589 So.2d 997 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), quashed on other grounds, 608 So.2d 804 (Fla.1992). In all other respects, appellant’s judgment and sentence are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walden v. State, 682 So. 2d 1196, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11960, 1996 WL 656170 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
682 So. 2d 1196 (Walden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown v. State
430 So. 2d 446 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Taylor v. State
589 So. 2d 997 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Taylor v. State
608 So. 2d 804 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)