Walden v. Shire

District Court, D. North Dakota·Decided November 18, 2022·No. 1:22-cv-00086·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION

ANTONIA WALDEN, individually and as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF SCOTT WALDEN, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Plaintiff, Civil No. 1:22-CV-00086 v. HASHI SHIRE, AJ LOGISTICS, INC., and FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., Defendants.

The parties, by their respective counsel, hereby agree to this Stipulation of Confidentiality and Protective Order (this “Order”). To expedite the flow of discovery material, facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality, protect material entitled to be kept confidential, and ensure that protection is afforded only to material entitled to such treatment, the parties agree as follows: I. DEFINITIONS A. “Confidential Information” is defined herein as a trade secret or other confidential research, evaluation, development or commercial information or material, or material that solely involves other parties, the disclosure of which is likely to prejudice the right of one or more parties or non-parties hereto, including information concerning proprietary research and development; business and marketing strategy; regulatory compliance and communication; financial results and projections; employee records; company policies and procedures; and similar documentation which is designated as “Confidential” by the Producing Party (or, in the case of medical records by the party securing the records), whether it be a Document, information contained in a Document, information revealed during a deposition, information revealed in an interrogatory answer, etc. In construing the scope of what constitutes “Confidential Information” as defined herein, reference is to be made to applicable case law regarding confidential or protected material. To the extent a Party is producing Confidential Information, the Party designating documents as confidential shall review all documents marked as confidential before marking them as such. The designating party shall also exercise discretion and good faith in designating documents as confidential. No Party shall designate documents as confidential without a reasonable basis for doing so pursuant to the definition of “confidential” as defined in this Order. B. “Stamped Confidential Document” means any Document which bears the mark “CONFIDENTIAL”– or which shall otherwise have had the mark recorded on it in a way that brings its attention to a reasonable examiner – to signify that it contains Confidential Information subject to protection under any this Order. C. “Document” means all written, recorded, or graphic material, whether produced or created by a party or another person, and whether produced pursuant to subpoena, by agreement, or otherwise. Interrogatory answers, responses to requests for admission, deposition transcripts and exhibits, pleadings, motions, affidavits, and briefs that quote, summarize, or contain Confidential Information may be accorded status as a Stamped Confidential Document, but, to the extent feasible, shall be prepared in such a manner that the Confidential Information is bound separately from that not entitled to protection. D. “Producing Party” means the party that produced the Confidential Information.

II. NON-DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION

A. Except with the prior written consent of the Producing Party, or as provided in this Order, Confidential Information and Stamped Confidential Documents may not be disclosed to any person. B. A Producing Party may, in its discretion, disclose its Confidential Information and/or designated Stamped Confidential Documents to any person. C. Confidential Information and Stamped Confidential Documents may be disclosed to: (1) The parties, including all employees, agents, third party administrators, insurers and investigators, as well as counsel of record for the parties in this action, including the partners, associates, “contract attorneys,” secretaries, paralegal assistants, and employees of such counsel, to the extent reasonably necessary to render professional services in the litigation. (2) Judges, court reporters, court personnel, or videographers present at trial, hearings, arguments, or depositions held in this matter. (3) Other persons who may be designated by written consent of the Producing Party or pursuant to a court order. D. Subject to sub-paragraph E, Confidential Information and Stamped Confidential Documents may also be disclosed to: (1) Persons noticed for depositions or designated as trial witnesses, to the extent reasonably necessary to prepare such persons to testify; (2) Consultants or experts retained for the purpose of assisting counsel of record in this action; and (3) Third-party contractors retained for the purpose of organizing, filing,

coding, converting, storing, or retrieving data or designing database programs for handling Documents. E. Before disclosing Confidential Information or Stamped Confidential Documents to any person pursuant to paragraph D, the party proposing such disclosure shall show a copy of this Order to such person, and he/she shall sign the Undertaking attached as Exhibit 1. F. Before disclosing Confidential Information or Stamped Confidential Documents pursuant to paragraph D to any person who is a competitor (or an employee of a competitor) of the Producing Party, the party proposing to make such disclosure shall give at least twenty-one (21) days advance notice in writing, which shall identify the person(s) to whom the disclosure will be made and a detailed explanation of why disclosure to such person(s) is necessary, to counsel for the Producing Party. If, within fourteen (14) days, after receiving advanced notice, the Producing Party objects in writing to the proposed disclosure, disclosure shall not be made until the parties have resolved the matter or the court has ruled on it. G. A recipient of Confidential Information and/or Stamped Confidential Documents shall exercise due care to restrict access to those persons described in II(C)(1). Any summary, copy of, or excerpt from a Stamped Confidential Document shall be subject to this Order to the same extent as the Stamped Confidential Document itself, and must be labeled as Confidential. A recipient shall not duplicate any Stamped Confidential Document or excerpt therefrom except for use as working copies and for filing in court. III. DECLASSIFICATION OF STAMPED CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT A party may challenge, by motion, the propriety of a confidential designation at any time within 90 days of the production of the Confidential Information and/or Stamped

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walden v. Shire, (D.N.D. 2022).

Walden v. Shire (Walden v. Shire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Juan Aquas Romero v. Drummond Co. Inc.
480 F.3d 1234 (Eleventh Circuit, 2007)