Waker v. Donald
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1112
CAROLYN ANNETTE WAKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BRENDA DONALD, Secretary, Department of Human Resources; JOSEPH JACKINS, Executive Director of Child Support, Department of Human Resources; FRAN JOHNSON, Director of Direct Services, Department of Human Resources; NADINE COUNTESS, Assistant Director of Interstate, Department of Human Resources,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:09-cv-01599-JFM)
Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 26, 2010
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carolyn Annette Waker, Appellant Pro Se. Julia Doyle Bernhardt, Assistant Attorney General, Elise Song Kurlander, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Carolyn Annette Waker appeals the district court’s
order dismissing her Americans with Disabilities Act complaint,
42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213 (West 2005 & Supp. 2009), for failure
to timely respond in accord with the court’s notice of December
3, 2009. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Waker v. Donald, No. 1:09-cv-01599-JFM (D. Md.
Dec. 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Waker v. Donald (Waker v. Donald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.