Waker v. Donald

380 F. App'x 298
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 26, 2010·No. No. 10-1112·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carolyn Annette Waker appeals the district court’s order dismissing her Americans with Disabilities Act complaint, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213 (West 2005 & Supp.2009), for failure to timely respond in accord with the court’s notice of December 3, 2009. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Waker v. Donald, No. 1:09-cv-01599-JFM (D.Md. Dec. 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Waker v. Donald, 380 F. App'x 298 (4th Cir. 2010).

380 F. App'x 298 (Waker v. Donald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 12101-12213
42 U.S.C. § 12101-12213