Wakefield v. South Boston Railroad
This text of 117 Mass. 544 (Wakefield v. South Boston Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff’s commutation check, which he received as a passenger in the car of the Metropolitan road from the conductor of that car, entitled him under the St. of 1871, e. 381, § 36, to a passage on the same day in any car run in the city by any other street railway “ between any two points therein,” without paying “ any sum beyond eight cents for both of the passages aforesaid.” This right the plaintiff had used up when he surrendered his check and left the second car. It cannot be fairly claimed that he had the right to three passages in three different cars.
[546]*546The fact that the defendant’s conductor when he took up the check had informed him that he might ride without pay to the place of his destination in the car from which he was ejected, affords him no excuse for refusing to pay his fare when demanded. The conductor of that car, whose duty it was to collect the fare, had no authority to give him a free passage upon his statement that the conductor of another car had promised it to him without any consideration. Conductors have no authority so to bind the corporation by which they are employed.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
117 Mass. 544, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wakefield-v-south-boston-railroad-mass-1875.