Waite v. United States

282 U.S. 508, 51 S. Ct. 227, 75 L. Ed. 494, 1931 U.S. LEXIS 24
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 24, 1931
Docket103
StatusPublished
Cited by59 cases

This text of 282 U.S. 508 (Waite v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Waite v. United States, 282 U.S. 508, 51 S. Ct. 227, 75 L. Ed. 494, 1931 U.S. LEXIS 24 (1931).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Holmes

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a suit under the Act of July 1, 1918, c. 114, 40 Stat.. 704, 705; U. S. Code, Title 35, § 68, to recover for the unlicensed use of a patented invention. The liability of the United States is established by the findings of the. Court of Claims and is not disputed. Neither is there any dispute that the profits that the plaintiff would have made are a proper measure of the damages suffered.' The Court of Claims, however, ruled that interest should not be allowed upon the amount so fixed, and a writ of cer-tiorari was granted by this Court upon that question.

The Government, without formally confessing error, states its. belief that interest should have been allowed. *509 The statute grants ‘ recovery of his reasonable and entire compensation for such use.’ We are of opinion that interest should be allowed in order to make the compensation ‘ entire.’ In addition to the purpose of the word, adverted to in Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. United States, 275 U. S. 331, 343, we cannot doubt that it was intended to accomplish complete justice as between the plaintiff and the United States. See Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. United States, 261 U. S. 299. Brooks-Scanlon Corp. v. United States, 265 U. S. 106. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. United States, 274 U. S. 215. Phelps v. United States, 274 U. S. 341.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fastship, LLC v. United States
Federal Claims, 2019
Hitkansut LLC v. United States
Federal Claims, 2019
N. Idaho Bldg. Contractors Ass'n v. City of Hayden
432 P.3d 976 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2018)
Liberty Ammunition, Inc. v. United States
119 Fed. Cl. 368 (Federal Claims, 2014)
Frank Gaylord v. United States
112 Fed. Cl. 539 (Federal Claims, 2013)
Honeywell International Inc. v. United States
107 Fed. Cl. 659 (Federal Claims, 2012)
National Food & Beverage Co. v. United States
105 Fed. Cl. 679 (Federal Claims, 2012)
Gaylord v. United States
678 F.3d 1339 (Federal Circuit, 2012)
Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States
87 Fed. Cl. 594 (Federal Claims, 2009)
Boeing Co. v. United States
86 Fed. Cl. 303 (Federal Claims, 2009)
CCA Associates v. United States
75 Fed. Cl. 170 (Federal Claims, 2007)
Cienega Gardens v. United States
67 Fed. Cl. 434 (Federal Claims, 2005)
Paymaster Technologies, Inc. v. United States
61 Fed. Cl. 593 (Federal Claims, 2004)
Federal Marketing Co. v. Virginia Impression Products Co.
823 A.2d 513 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2003)
Standard Manufacturing Co. v. United States
42 Fed. Cl. 748 (Federal Claims, 1999)
Polaroid Corp. v. Offerman
507 S.E.2d 284 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1998)
Hatter v. United States
38 Fed. Cl. 166 (Federal Claims, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
282 U.S. 508, 51 S. Ct. 227, 75 L. Ed. 494, 1931 U.S. LEXIS 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waite-v-united-states-scotus-1931.