Wailes Dove-Hermiston Corp. v. Walworth Co.
This text of 99 Pa. Super. 19 (Wailes Dove-Hermiston Corp. v. Walworth Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from an order refusing judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. After reading the pleadings, and considering argument of counsel, we cannot say it is “clear and free from doubt” that the court below erred in refusing judgment; following the usual course pursued in such cases, we shall not disturb the orders appealed from; nor shall we discuss the applicable rules of law, till an opportunity is had fully to develop the facts at trial: Philadelphia v. Merchant & Evans Co., 289 Pa. 578; Hulton v. Union Ice & C. S. Co., 291 Pa. 447; Jaffe v. Lipsky Bros., 291 Pa. 470, and Real Estate-Land Title & Tr. Co., Executor, v. Fidelity Mutual L. I. Co., 2'95 Pa. 90.
The order appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 Pa. Super. 19, 1930 Pa. Super. LEXIS 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wailes-dove-hermiston-corp-v-walworth-co-pasuperct-1930.