Philadelphia v. Merchant & Evans Co.

137 A. 926, 289 Pa. 578, 1927 Pa. LEXIS 602
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 19, 1927·No. Appeal, 204·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The court below refused to enter judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, and plaintiff has appealed. Without expressing or intimating any view on the several questions argued in the briefs, it is enough to say that this ease falls within the rule that we do not reverse on appeals from orders such as the one now before us unless the action of the court below clearly appears to be based on a plain error of law; we cannot say this of the present order.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Philadelphia v. Merchant & Evans Co., 137 A. 926, 289 Pa. 578, 1927 Pa. LEXIS 602 (Pa. 1927).

137 A. 926 (Philadelphia v. Merchant & Evans Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richter v. Friedrich
169 A. 391 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Fisher Et Ux. v. City of Phila.
170 A. 875 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Smith v. Brockway Motor Truck Corp.
153 A. 333 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Wailes Dove-Hermiston Corp. v. Walworth Co.
99 Pa. Super. 19 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Kaster v. Pennsylvania Fuel Supply Co.
150 A. 153 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
B. F. Goodrich Rubber Co. v. Motor Tire Corp.
140 A. 269 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)