Waheed v. Rentoulis

• Court: District Court, S.D. New York
• Decided: September 9, 2024
• Docket: 1:24-cv-06476
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SEHRA WAHEED; THE SEREN FASHION ART & INTERIORS, LLC, Plaintiffs, -against- 24-CV-6476 (LTS) NICKOLAOS RENTOULIS; ANDRONIKI ORDER RENTOULIS; IRINI’S ORIGINALS, LLC; SM1 MMS, LLC, DBA MANHATTAN MINI STORAGE, LLC; BURNAM SMARTCO, LLC; CRIS BURNAM; MIKE BURNAM, Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff Sehra Waheed, proceeding pro se, has filed a complaint and an unsigned order to show cause requesting preliminary injunctive relief. To obtain such relief, Plaintiff must show: (1) that she is likely to suffer irreparable harm and (2) either (a) a likelihood of success on the merits of her case or (b) sufficiently serious questions going to the merits to make them a fair ground for litigation and a balance of hardships tipping decidedly in her favor. See UBS Fin. Servs., Inc. v. W.V. Univ. Hosps., Inc., 660 F. 3d 643, 648 (2d Cir. 2011) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); Wright v. Giuliani, 230 F.3d 543, 547 (2000). Preliminary injunctive relief “is an extraordinary and drastic remedy, one that should not be granted unless the movant, by a clear showing, carries the burden of persuasion.” Moore v. Consol. Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc., 409 F.3d 506, 510 (2d Cir. 2005) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Plaintiff’s submissions do not demonstrate: (1) a likelihood of success on the merits, or (2) sufficiently serious questions going to the merits to make them a fair ground for litigation and a balance of hardships tipping decidedly in her favor. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s request for an order to show cause (ECF No. 4) is denied. The Court will issue an explanatory order at a later date. CONCLUSION Plaintiff’s request for an order to show cause (ECF No. 4) is denied. Plaintiff consents to electronic service. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an

appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: September 9, 2024 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge