Wagner v. Leenhouts

Supreme Court

Wagner v. Leenhouts

287 U.S. 571, 53 S. Ct. 119, 77 L. Ed. 502, 1932 U.S. LEXIS 56

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 7, 1932

DocketNo. 452

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 287 U.S. 571 (Wagner v. Leenhouts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wagner v. Leenhouts, 287 U.S. 571, 53 S. Ct. 119, 77 L. Ed. 502, 1932 U.S. LEXIS 56 (1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the state court here sought to be reviewed was based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U. S. 302, 303; Arneson v. United Irrigation Co., 284 U. S. 592, 593; Potter v. Maybury, 284 U. S. 593, 594; Ellison Ranching Co. v. Bartlett, 284 U. S. 598.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the state court here sought to be reviewed was based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U. S. 302, 303; Arneson v. United Irrigation Co., 284 U. S. 592, 593; Potter v. Maybury, 284 U. S. 593, 594; Ellison Ranching Co. v. Bartlett, 284 U. S. 598.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

287 U.S. 571, 53 S. Ct. 119, 77 L. Ed. 502, 1932 U.S. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wagner-v-leenhouts-scotus-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack