Arneson v. United Irrigation Co.

284 U.S. 592, 52 S. Ct. 202, 76 L. Ed. 510, 1932 U.S. LEXIS 900
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 18, 1932
DocketNo. 319
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 284 U.S. 592 (Arneson v. United Irrigation Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arneson v. United Irrigation Co., 284 U.S. 592, 52 S. Ct. 202, 76 L. Ed. 510, 1932 U.S. LEXIS 900 (1932).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the decree of the state court sought here to be reviewed was based on non-federal grounds adequate to support it (Parson Son [593]*593& Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268; Browne v. Union Pacific R. Co., 267 U. S. 255; Live Oak Water Users’ Assn. v. Railroad Commission, 269 U. S. 354, 359; Security National Bank v. Twinde, 278 U. S. 659; Garysburg Mfg. Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 280 U. S. 520); and for the want of a substantial federal question (Wabash Ry. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191).

Mr. S. J. Brooks, with whom Mr. W. L. Matthews was on the brief, for appellants. Messrs. J. Q. Henry, pro hac vice, by leave of Court, and John A. Mobley, with whom Mr. W. L. Cook was on the brief, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bundrick v. Lafayette Parish Police Jury
462 So. 2d 1319 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1985)
Budd Const. Co., Inc. v. City of Alexandria
401 So. 2d 1070 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1981)
Lovret v. Seyfarth
22 Cal. App. 3d 841 (California Court of Appeal, 1972)
Bennett v. Brown County Water Improvement District No. One
272 S.W.2d 498 (Texas Supreme Court, 1954)
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1951
Wagner v. Leenhouts
287 U.S. 571 (Supreme Court, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
284 U.S. 592, 52 S. Ct. 202, 76 L. Ed. 510, 1932 U.S. LEXIS 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arneson-v-united-irrigation-co-scotus-1932.