Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Waddle v. Waddle

Waddle v. Waddle

478 So. 2d 120, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2527, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16752
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 13, 1985
DocketNo. 85-744
StatusPublished

This text of 478 So. 2d 120 (Waddle v. Waddle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Waddle v. Waddle, 478 So. 2d 120, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2527, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16752 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the award of rehabilitative alimony, taking note that the trial court’s appropriate concern was expressed in the final judgment wherein it reserved jurisdiction to reevaluate the wife’s need for rehabilitative or permanent alimony at the end of the one year period for which only the former was awarded. We reverse the denial of the wife’s costs and attorney’s fees and remand for award to her of same. Schuttler v. Schuttler, 429 So.2d 1338 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

DOWNEY, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schuttler v. Schuttler
429 So. 2d 1338 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
478 So. 2d 120, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2527, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waddle-v-waddle-fladistctapp-1985.