Schuttler v. Schuttler

429 So. 2d 1338, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 29073
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 20, 1983·No. No. 82-679·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the wife from a final judgment of dissolution. Because of the substantial disparity in the incomes of the parties, we believe the trial court erred in denying the wife’s request for attorney’s fees. We also believe the trial court erred in awarding the husband the entire proceeds of an income tax refund payable jointly to both parties. We approve the provisions for alimony and the distribution of the marital assets as being within the bounds of discretion set out in Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). We are simply not permitted to substitute our opinion on those issues if reasonable persons could differ as to the results.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and this cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

ANSTEAD, BERANEK, and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schuttler v. Schuttler, 429 So. 2d 1338, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 29073 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

429 So. 2d 1338 (Schuttler v. Schuttler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Waddle v. Waddle
478 So. 2d 120 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Shafey v. Shafey
461 So. 2d 144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)