Wachtel v. Western Sizzlin Corp.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wachtel v. Western Sizzlin Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 1998 Tenn. App. LEXIS 434
Court of Appeals of Tennessee·Decided August 12, 1998·No. 01A01-9708-CH-00396·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED August 12, 1998 DAVID K. WACHTEL, JR., ) Cecil W. Crowson ) Appellate Court Clerk Plaintiff/Appellant, ) ) Appeal No. VS. ) 01-A-01-9708-CH-00396 ) THE WESTERN SIZZLIN ) Davidson Chancery CORPORATION f/k/a FRANCHISEE ) No. 95-781-I ACQUISITION CORPORATION, ) ) Defendant-Counter ) Claimant/Appellee ) ) VS. ) ) DAVID K. WACHTEL, JR., AND ) RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT ) SERVICES, INC., ) ) Counter-Defendants. )

ORD ER O N PE TITION TO REHE AR

The appellee has filed a respectful Petition to Rehear. After reviewing

the grounds for the petition, we are of the opinion that it should be overruled. It is,

therefore, ordered that the petition be overruled.

__________________________________ BEN H. CANTRELL, JUDGE

__________________________________ WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE

__________________________________ WALTER W. BUSSART, SPECIAL JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wachtel v. Western Sizzlin Corp., (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).

Wachtel v. Western Sizzlin Corp. (Wachtel v. Western Sizzlin Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.