W. L. Moody & Co. v. Freeman-Sipes Co.

1911 OK 298, 118 P. 134, 118 P. 135, 29 Okla. 390, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 320
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided September 12, 1911·No. 1461·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

HAYES, J.

Plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff below, has brought this proceeding to have reviewed an order of the trial court, vacating and setting aside a judgment upon default, and permitting defendants in error, defendants below, to hie their answer and defend against the action. Such an order is not a final order, but is interlocutory, from which no appeal lies to this court. Aetna Bldg. & Loan Ass’n v. Williams et al., 26 Okla. 191, 108 Pac. 1100; Maddle v. Beavers, 24 Okla. 703, 104 Pac. 909; W. L. Moody & Co. v. Freeman & Williams et al., 24 Okla. 701, 104 Pac. 30; Town of Byars v. Sprouls, 24 Okla. 299, 103 Pac. 1038.

This appeal is therefore dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

W. L. Moody & Co. v. Freeman-Sipes Co., 1911 OK 298, 118 P. 134, 118 P. 135, 29 Okla. 390, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 320 (Okla. 1911).

1911 OK 298 (W. L. Moody & Co. v. Freeman-Sipes Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pennsylvania Co. v. Potter
1923 OK 59 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Vann v. Union Central Life Ins. Co.
1920 OK 243 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1920)
Gilliam v. Kali-Inla Coal Co.
1918 OK 297 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1918)
City of Eufaula v. Ahrens
159 P. 327 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)
Berger Mfg. v. School Dist. No. 10 of Muskogee Co.
1914 OK 606 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)
Rahl v. Marlow State Bank
1913 OK 220 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Pierce Coal Co. v. Walker
1912 OK 813 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)