W. Kay Co. v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 882
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in W. Kay Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 53 Cust. Ct. 130
United States Customs Court·Decided April 20, 1967·No. No. P67/115; protests 297616-K, 317460-K, and 318667-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company (47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of W. Kay Company, Inc. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

W. Kay Co. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 882 (cusc 1967).

58 Cust. Ct. 882 (W. Kay Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

W. Kay Co. v. United States
53 Cust. Ct. 130 (U.S. Customs Court, 1964)