W. Kay Co. v. United States

56 Cust. Ct. 903
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in W. Kay Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 53 Cust. Ct. 130
United States Customs Court·Decided April 28, 1966·No. No. P66/47; protest 61/8878 (Los Angeles)·Published

Opinion

Landis, J.

In accordance witli stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protest consist of after-dinner coffee cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company (47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing-protest consist of tea cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of W. Kay Company, Inc. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claims of the plantiff were sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

W. Kay Co. v. United States, 56 Cust. Ct. 903 (cusc 1966).

56 Cust. Ct. 903 (W. Kay Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

W. Kay Co. v. United States
53 Cust. Ct. 130 (U.S. Customs Court, 1964)