W. Howes Meade v. C. Edward Goldberg, Individually, and C. Edward Goldberg, Agent

249 F.2d 957
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedOctober 26, 1957
Docket13038
StatusPublished

This text of 249 F.2d 957 (W. Howes Meade v. C. Edward Goldberg, Individually, and C. Edward Goldberg, Agent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
W. Howes Meade v. C. Edward Goldberg, Individually, and C. Edward Goldberg, Agent, 249 F.2d 957 (6th Cir. 1957).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard on appeal from the judgment of the district court, and on appeal from the order of the district court denying appellant relief from judgment under Section 412.-110 of the Kentucky Revised Statutes, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment and order appealed from be and are hereby affirmed in accordance with the opinion of Judge Ford and on the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stasny Music Corp. v. Santly-Joy, Inc.
249 F.2d 957 (Second Circuit, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 F.2d 957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/w-howes-meade-v-c-edward-goldberg-individually-and-c-edward-goldberg-ca6-1957.