W. Howes Meade v. C. Edward Goldberg, Individually, and C. Edward Goldberg, Agent

249 F.2d 957
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 26, 1957·No. 13038·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard on appeal from the judgment of the district court, and on appeal from the order of the district court denying appellant relief from judgment under Section 412.-110 of the Kentucky Revised Statutes, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment and order appealed from be and are hereby affirmed in accordance with the opinion of Judge Ford and on the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

W. Howes Meade v. C. Edward Goldberg, Individually, and C. Edward Goldberg, Agent, 249 F.2d 957 (6th Cir. 1957).

249 F.2d 957 (W. Howes Meade v. C. Edward Goldberg, Individually, and C. Edward Goldberg, Agent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stasny Music Corp. v. Santly-Joy, Inc.
249 F.2d 957 (Second Circuit, 1957)