Stasny Music Corp. v. Santly-Joy, Inc.
This text of 249 F.2d 957 (Stasny Music Corp. v. Santly-Joy, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
249 F.2d 957
STASNY MUSIC CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SANTLY-JOY, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 83.
Docket 24644.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued November 15, 1957.
Decided December 2, 1957.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Edward Weinfeld, Judge.
Plaintiff, Stasny Music Corp., appeals from the dismissal of its action against Santly-Joy, Inc., for copyright infringement of a song because of failure to file the notice of use for mechanical reproduction required by the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 1(e).
Fred G. Moritt, New York City (Howard N. Beldock, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant.
Arnold J. Bernstein, of Abeles & Bernstein, New York City, for defendant-appellee.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, MOORE, Circuit Judge, and LEIBELL, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the opinion of District Judge Weinfeld. 156 F.Supp. 795.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 F.2d 957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stasny-music-corp-v-santly-joy-inc-ca2-1957.