Vulcan Steel Structures, Inc. A/K/A Vulcan All-Steel Structures, Inc. v. Gary John McCarty

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Vulcan Steel Structures, Inc. A/K/A Vulcan All-Steel Structures, Inc. v. Gary John McCarty

DecidedDecember 3, 2013

DocketA14I0067

StatusPublished

This text of Vulcan Steel Structures, Inc. A/K/A Vulcan All-Steel Structures, Inc. v. Gary John McCarty (Vulcan Steel Structures, Inc. A/K/A Vulcan All-Steel Structures, Inc. v. Gary John McCarty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vulcan Steel Structures, Inc. A/K/A Vulcan All-Steel Structures, Inc. v. Gary John McCarty, (Ga. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,__________________ December 03, 2013

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A14I0067. VULCAN STEEL STRUCTURES, INC. A/K/A VULCAN ALL- STEEL STRUCTURES, INC., et al. v. GARY JOHN MCCARTY, et al.

Vulcan Steel Structures, Inc., et al, filed this action against its former employee Gary McCarty and his new employer, alleging, inter alia, that McCarty breached certain provisions of his employment agreement when he left Vulcan and began working for the defendants. The defendants filed a counterclaim, seeking a declaratory judgment that the restrictive covenants in McCarty’s employment agreement are unenforceable. The trial court entered a ruling in the defendants’ favor, declaring that the covenants are void and unenforceable. After the trial court certified its order for immediate review, the plaintiffs filed this application for interlocutory appeal. The trial court’s order constitutes a declaratory judgment disposing of some but not all of the issues in this case. And, even though the case remains pending below, a declaratory judgment “[has] the force and effect of a final judgment or decree and [is] reviewable as such.” OCGA § 9-4-2 (a); see Building Block Enterprises, LLC v. State Bank & Trust Company, 314 Ga. App. 147, 149-150 (1) (723 SE2d 467) (2012). Therefore, this order is subject to direct appeal. We will grant a timely application for interlocutory review if the order complained of is subject to direct appeal and the applicant has not otherwise filed a timely notice of appeal. Spivey v. Hembree, 268 Ga. App. 485, 486, n.1 (602 SE2d 246) (2004). Accordingly, this application for appeal is GRANTED. The applicants shall have ten days from the date of this order to file a notice of appeal in the superior court, if it has not already done so. The clerk of the superior court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to this court.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 12/03/2013 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,__________________ December 03, 2013

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A14I0067. VULCAN STEEL STRUCTURES, INC. A/K/A VULCAN ALL- STEEL STRUCTURES, INC., et al. v. GARY JOHN MCCARTY, et al.

Vulcan Steel Structures, Inc., et al, filed this action against its former employee Gary McCarty and his new employer, alleging, inter alia, that McCarty breached certain provisions of his employment agreement when he left Vulcan and began working for the defendants. The defendants filed a counterclaim, seeking a declaratory judgment that the restrictive covenants in McCarty’s employment agreement are unenforceable. The trial court entered a ruling in the defendants’ favor, declaring that the covenants are void and unenforceable. After the trial court certified its order for immediate review, the plaintiffs filed this application for interlocutory appeal. The trial court’s order constitutes a declaratory judgment disposing of some but not all of the issues in this case. And, even though the case remains pending below, a declaratory judgment “[has] the force and effect of a final judgment or decree and [is] reviewable as such.” OCGA § 9-4-2 (a); see Building Block Enterprises, LLC v. State Bank & Trust Company, 314 Ga. App. 147, 149-150 (1) (723 SE2d 467) (2012). Therefore, this order is subject to direct appeal. We will grant a timely application for interlocutory review if the order complained of is subject to direct appeal and the applicant has not otherwise filed a timely notice of appeal. Spivey v. Hembree, 268 Ga. App. 485, 486, n.1 (602 SE2d 246) (2004). Accordingly, this application for appeal is GRANTED. The applicants shall have ten days from the date of this order to file a notice of appeal in the superior court, if it has not already done so. The clerk of the superior court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to this court.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 12/03/2013 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Vulcan Steel Structures, Inc. A/K/A Vulcan All-Steel Structures, Inc. v. Gary John McCarty, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vulcan-steel-structures-inc-aka-vulcan-all-steel-structures-inc-v-gactapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack