Votta v. Commonwealth

826 N.E.2d 200, 444 Mass. 1001, 2005 Mass. LEXIS 172
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedApril 28, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 826 N.E.2d 200 (Votta v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Votta v. Commonwealth, 826 N.E.2d 200, 444 Mass. 1001, 2005 Mass. LEXIS 172 (Mass. 2005).

Opinion

The claims now being made by the petitioner were raised and decided against him either in his direct appeal, Commonwealth v. Votta, 42 Mass. App. Ct. 1124, S.C., 425 Mass. 1106 (1997); or in his appeal from the denial of his motion for a new trial, Commonwealth v. Votta, 60 Mass. App. Ct. 1115, S.C., 441 Mass. 1106 (2004); or, at the very least, could have been raised in the prior proceedings. See Votta v. Commonwealth, 435 Mass. 1013 (2002) (affirming denial of petitioner’s first petition for relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3). Our general superintendence power cannot be invoked simply to get another bite of the apple.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garden v. Commonwealth
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2020
Votta v. Commonwealth
834 N.E.2d 749 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
826 N.E.2d 200, 444 Mass. 1001, 2005 Mass. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/votta-v-commonwealth-mass-2005.