Voorhis v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
92 A.D.2d 501, 460 N.Y.S.2d 282, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16711
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 17, 1983
StatusPublished
This text of 92 A.D.2d 501 (Voorhis v. Consolidated Rail Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Voorhis v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 92 A.D.2d 501, 460 N.Y.S.2d 282, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16711 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).
Opinions
— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Kuhnen, J.), entered on March 8, 1982, after a jury verdict in favor of defendant, affirmed, without costs. Asch and Alexander, JJ., concur in separate memoranda in both of which Kupferman, J., concurs and Murphy, P. J., and Sullivan, J., dissent in a memorandum by Sullivan, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Railroad Co. v. Fraloff
100 U.S. 24 (Supreme Court, 1879)
McLoughlin v. New York Edison Co.
169 N.E. 277 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)
Riley v. . Standard Oil Co.
132 N.E. 97 (New York Court of Appeals, 1921)
Osborn v. Cline
189 N.E. 483 (New York Court of Appeals, 1934)
Wamser v. . Browning, King Co.
79 N.E. 861 (New York Court of Appeals, 1907)
Magnin v. . Dinsmore
62 N.Y. 35 (New York Court of Appeals, 1875)
Jones v. Weigand
134 A.D. 644 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
Nathan v. Woolverton
147 A.D. 908 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Nathan v. Woolverton
69 Misc. 425 (New York Supreme Court, 1910)
Sherman v. Pullman Co.
79 Misc. 52 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)
Crosby v. 20 Fifth Avenue Hotel Co.
173 Misc. 604 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)
Rounds v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
64 N.Y. 129 (New York Court of Appeals, 1876)
Hasbrouck v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
202 N.Y. 363 (New York Court of Appeals, 1911)
Sauter v. New York Tribune, Inc.
113 N.E.2d 790 (New York Court of Appeals, 1953)
Makoske v. Lombardy
350 N.E.2d 408 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Basso v. Miller
352 N.E.2d 868 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Riviello v. Waldron
391 N.E.2d 1278 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
J. W. Mays, Inc. v. Hertz Corp.
15 A.D.2d 105 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
Makoske v. Lombardy
47 A.D.2d 284 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
Tortora v. LaVoy
54 A.D.2d 1036 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
92 A.D.2d 501, 460 N.Y.S.2d 282, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/voorhis-v-consolidated-rail-corp-nyappdiv-1983.