Crosby v. 20 Fifth Avenue Hotel Co.
This text of 173 Misc. 604 (Crosby v. 20 Fifth Avenue Hotel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A hotel is not chargeable as a bailee for a valuable antique left in a trunk where plaintiff did not give notice that the trunk contained anything but ordinary personal luggage. (Waters v. Beau Site Co., 114 Misc. 65; Magnin v. Dinsmore, 62 N. Y. 35.)
Judgment modified by reducing the amount thereof to the sum of seventy-five dollars, with costs, and as modified affirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs to the appellants.
All concur. Present — Hammer, Shientag and Noonan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
173 Misc. 604, 17 N.Y.S.2d 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crosby-v-20-fifth-avenue-hotel-co-nyappterm-1940.