Voightmann & Co. v. Cross-Conklin Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Voightmann & Co. v. Cross-Conklin Co.

183 Ill. App. 312

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided November 21, 1913·No. Gen. No. 18,233·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Duncan

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Mechanics’ liens, § 202*—when judgment may he rendered against contractor. Where in a subcontractor’s action in assumpsit under the Mechanics’ Liens Act, § 28, J. & A., If 7166, against the owner and contractor, no lien is established against the owner, judgment may he rendered against the contractor. 5. Process, § 2*—party served with, summons must he made defendant. Serving a summons on a party without making him a party defendant to the suit does not make him a party defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Duncan

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Mechanics’ liens, § 202*—when judgment may he rendered against contractor. Where in a subcontractor’s action in assumpsit under the Mechanics’ Liens Act, § 28, J. & A., If 7166, against the owner and contractor, no lien is established against the owner, judgment may he rendered against the contractor. 5. Process, § 2*—party served with, summons must he made defendant. Serving a summons on a party without making him a party defendant to the suit does not make him a party defendant.

Voightmann & Co. v. Cross-Conklin Co., 183 Ill. App. 312 (Ill. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

183 Ill. App. 312 (Voightmann & Co. v. Cross-Conklin Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related