Vogt v. Witmeyer

665 N.E.2d 189, 87 N.Y.2d 998, 642 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 294
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 21, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 665 N.E.2d 189 (Vogt v. Witmeyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vogt v. Witmeyer, 665 N.E.2d 189, 87 N.Y.2d 998, 642 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 294 (N.Y. 1996).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff had been designated as a one-fifth remainder beneficiary in an August 1986 amendment to a revocable trust created by the settlor six years earlier. Unbeknownst to plaintiff, the settlor executed a fourth amendment in December 1988, removing plaintiff as beneficiary, which remained in effect at the settlor’s death three years later. Plaintiff brought this action against the settlor’s trustee, her attorneys and one of the remainder beneficiaries for allegedly depriving her of her remainder interest in the trust, asserting separate causes of action based on theories of tortious interference with prospective inheritance, prima facie tort, conspiracy, ratification and mistake. Supreme Court dismissed all causes of action and the Appellate Division affirmed (212 AD2d 1013).

Plaintiff seeks reinstatement of her cause of action grounded upon tortious interference with prospective inheritance. New York, however, has not recognized a right of action for tortious interference with prospective inheritance (see, Hutchins v Hutchins, 7 Hill 104), and, in any event, such a cause of action would require that the interference be accomplished by some type of independently tortious conduct (see, Restatement [Second] of Torts § 774B). Except for purely conclusory assertions, plaintiff failed to plead any tortious acts by defendants causing the settlor to modify the trust.

*1000 Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

dewdney v. duncan
Vermont Superior Court, 2024
Matter of Radio Drama Network, Inc.
2020 NY Slip Op 05704 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Barclay v. Castruccio
230 A.3d 80 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2020)
Briggs v. Briggs
2019 S.D. 37 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2019)
Milligan v. Bifulco
2017 NY Slip Op 6784 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
O'Sullivan v. Hallock
101 A.D.3d 1313 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Jacobs v. Kay
50 A.D.3d 526 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Aetna Casualty And Surety Co. v. Aniero Concrete Co.
404 F.3d 566 (Second Circuit, 2005)
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Aniero Concrete Co.
404 F.3d 566 (Second Circuit, 2005)
Heisler v. City of Buffalo
11 A.D.3d 998 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re of the Arbitration between Town of Evans & International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
6 A.D.3d 1157 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Weizmann Institute of Science v. Neschis
229 F. Supp. 2d 234 (S.D. New York, 2002)
Snyder v. Sony Music Entertainment, Inc.
252 A.D.2d 294 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Lake Claire Homeowners Ass'n v. Rosenberg
245 A.D.2d 427 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
665 N.E.2d 189, 87 N.Y.2d 998, 642 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vogt-v-witmeyer-ny-1996.